Vegaphobia

This paper critically examines discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers in 2007. In setting parameters for what can and cannot easily be discussed, dominant discourses also help frame understanding. Discourses relating to veganism are therefore presented as contravening commonsense, because they fall outside readily understood meat-eating discourses. Newspapers tend to discredit veganism through ridicule, or as being difficult or impossible to maintain in practice. Vegans are variously stereotyped as ascetics, faddists, sentimentalists, or in some cases, hostile extremists. The overall effect is of a derogatory portrayal of vegans and veganism that we interpret as ‘vegaphobia’. We interpret derogatory discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers as evidence of the cultural reproduction of speciesism, through which veganism is dissociated from its connection with debates concerning nonhuman animals’ rights or liberation. This is problematic in three, interrelated, respects. First, it empirically misrepresents the experience of veganism, and thereby marginalizes vegans. Second, it perpetuates a moral injury to omnivorous readers who are not presented with the opportunity to understand veganism and the challenge to speciesism that it contains. Third, and most seriously, it obscures and thereby reproduces exploitative and violent relations between human and nonhuman animals.

© London School of Economics and Political Science 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21361905

Maternity does not understand about species, 13th of May 2012 (Mother’s Day)

For two hours, three EligeVeganismo’s activists remained caged, simulating the situation of millions of mothers of different species while giving birth. The activity was made at Mother’s Day, and it allowed us to inform the community about the maternity conditions of those who have been unlucky enough to not be born human.

You can see the album here: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.392827114094639.96982.140468395997180&type=1

Open rescue of eight turkeys, realized the 6th of May, 2012, by activists of EligeVeganismo, Chile.

You can see all the photos here: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.388562601187757.96313.140468395997180&type=3

You can see the video here (Spanish): http://youtu.be/tLLVEchi-aw

EligeVeganismo, because animals are not our slaves.

Trifling mark ass trick ass mark: Money privilege. Meat Privilege. Country Privilege. Species Privilege. →

thatangryblackgrrrl:

1. Money Privilege - Implying that non-westernized countries do not have currency or don’t have the ability to access goods.

2. Meat Privilege - How the fuck are you privileged with something that is completely accessible to MOST people? I have to take a train ride into Manhattan for a fucking whole foods but there are 5 fast food places near my house. Food Deserts, look them up. They exist here too.

3. Country privilege - Still implying that western countries are better than non-westernized countries and that they are so much worst than us. It is important when discussing privileges based on class and status to acknowledge that not everyone in America has these privileges either. You are further proving our point that vegan activism is mostly white, privileged, middle to upper class people who do not understand or acknowledge INTERSECTIONALITY. 

4. Species Privilege - Still, what the fuck are you even saying? 

So, since I see you didn’t understand what I meant, I’ll make it clear for you. I’ll delete the gifs though, they’re distracting.

1. No. Money privilege as in “you have money”. Money to buy meat, dairy, and other animal sub products, and to buy a refrigerator to prevent them from rotting. And to pay for electricity. It’s not quite exactly class privilege, but maybe we could agree that it’s similar.

2. Meat privilege as in “you have money to buy meat, which I stated on the post is expensive”. Not all countries subsidize their meat and dairy production to make them cheap, and that’s, for example, the situation in Chile. Saying “But you have to be rich to be vegan” is just ignoring the fact that meat is expensive, and that poor people can’t afford it. Maybe this will make it more clear to you:

Meat = Expensive =/= Accesible for poor people = Meat as a privilege

3. Country privilege as in “some countries like the US like to subsidize animal products and give food stamps so people don’t starve. That’s not how it works on most countries”. You have country privilege when you can, for example, attend to an awesome University for free (Germany), or get food stamps (US), which wouldn’t happen if you lived on another country. Nice try twisting my words though. Oh, and btw, most vegans I know are Chileans, Argentinians, Venezuelans, Peruvians. POC. Poor, rich, middle class. HOMELESS. That plays no role when you realize that you’re not the center of the world, and that some have it worse than you.

4. Species privilege: I think we covered that before, when I answered your reblog. But, after that, I got new information (looking for your extense essay about how speciecism doesn’t exist).

Anon asked:

so, this might just be cause ctrl-f doesn’t really work on yr page, but i can’t find any instance of you actually seriously discussing the idea of species privilege in any depth. like, you kinda seem to dismiss it out of hand, which is totally fine, it’s your blog, but also i’d be interested to know why cause it seems to me to make a lot of sense. x

thatangryblackgrrrrl replied:

I think species privilege is a joke because not every human being has the same amount of privileges to begin with, so how can we compare the two?

Human beings do not have equal rights and are being slaughtered in unfair ways throughout this world, I’d rather focus on that than the slaughtering of animals. And this is coming from a former vegan.

I believe people who speak of species privilege ignore the fact that they in fact have privileges (like racial privilege, gender privilege, etc). The same people who talk about how the poor animals are treated won’t consider the people in their own country, their own neighborhoods, in their own lives who are treated poorly.

Most vegans also ignore the fact that the people who provide their “cruelty-free” food are being tortured and treated inhumanely on what are close to slave wages. Blood is still being shed, just not an animal’s.

I’ll critically consider veganism AGAIN when humans aren’t treated like animals first.

So, step by step.

Not every human has the same amount of privilege so how can we compare that with the absolute lack of privilege that non humans face? Well, that just ignores everything we know about intersectionality. Would anybody say that, if we have a poor male, he’s just as privileged/oppressed as a poor female? No, because even if he is in a position of oppression due his lack of money, he still has male privilege. Same principle applies for human privilege. Nevermind that someone’s being really, really oppressed. Ze still has human privilege, because ze will still have the right to not be considered an object (aka not being commodified).

And what happens with human slaves? Because we know that there are human slaves. Well, first off, they are still legally recognized has individuals with rights, but those rights are being violated. And secondly, those people were turned into slaves because of reasons that have nothing to do with their species. Nobody said: “Oh, I’ll “traffic” her because she’s a human!”, but most likely because she was: a woman, poor, uneducated, etc, etc. 

The part when you go: “I’d rather concentrate on humans being slaughtered than animals” reminded me of: http://speciesism-denying-humans.tumblr.com/post/5263783899/picture-background-8-piece-pie-style-color#notes

What do you exactly do to help humans in need? I’m just curious. And, how does veganism get in the way of that? You can do more than you think you can. Particularly when you do things that you know are right.

And I like how you asume that vegans don’t care about humans. That’s just fallacious. In a high degree. First off: Humans are animals. Vegans care about animals. Since humans are animals, and vegans care about animals, vegans also care about the human species. 

You’re also ignoring several organizations that try their harder to provide vegan food to famine affected areas, like A well fed world. http://awellfedworld.org/. And you should know that animal farming wastes a lot of resources (water, grains, etc), and is the number one cause of global warming, while also polluting earth, water and air. So eating meat does nothing to help starving people (even in your own country, because expecting one country to ship food for free to an impoverished one is to be a dreamer), and actually fucks up the environment.

Do you ever stop and think about the (human) people that got injured while producing your food? Like, slaughterhouse workers, who can be kicked by a desperate animal while murdering hir? Who are subjected to unfair and dangerous work conditions, develop mental diseases like stress, and after all their work, feel guilty as hell? Have you ever talked to a slaughterhouse worker and the nightmare that their daily rutine is for them? Well, look no further! You can check that info here: http://boingboing.net/2012/03/08/working-undercover-in-a-slaugh.html.

Also, do you check were do your veggies come from? Are they not picked by an immigrant? Is your food not cruel to humans too? Question your own food too. “It’s easy to see the straw on the eye of somebody else, while having a stone on ours.”

As I red somewhere in Tumblr a long while ago: “Animal products are inherently cruel, while vegan products only incidentally cruel”. Vegans actually try their best to avoid all forms of animal exploitation, and that considers humans too.  

You should consider veganism because that’s the best you can do using your human privilege to make it easier for non human animals (aka the oppressed).

This is an oldie but goldie.

“Eight activists of EligeVeganismo chained themselves the afternoon of the 22th of january 2011, to the cages of different species at the Metropolitan Zoo (Zoológico Metropolitano).

Amid shouts of slogans referring to animal exploitation and handing out flyers, the activists were taken by police and Special Forces who had to cut one by one the chains.”

You can see the whole photo album here.

quoilecanard:

treekisser:

I may be about 2000 years late, but I’m kind of in love with Plutarch.

“Can you really ask what reason Pythagoras had for abstaining from flesh?

For my part I rather wonder both by what accident and in what state of soul or mind the first man did so, touched his mouth to gore and brought his lips to the flesh of a dead creature, he who set forth tables of dead, stale bodies and ventured to call food and nourishment the parts that had a little before bellowed and cried, moved and lived. How could his eyes endure the slaughter when throats were slit and hides flayed and limbs torn from limb? How could his nose endure the stench? How was it that the pollution did not turn away his taste, which made contact with the sores of others and sucked juices and serums from mortal wounds?… It is certainly not lions and wolves that we eat out of self-defense; on the contrary, we ignore these and slaughter harmless, tame creatures without stings or teeth to harm us, creatures that, I swear, Nature appears to have produced for the sake of their beautyand grace. But nothing abashed us, not the flower-like tinting of the flesh, not the persuasiveness of the harmonious voice, not the cleanliness of their habits or the unusual intelligence that may be found in the poor wretches.

No, for the sake of a little flesh we deprive them of sun, of light, of the duration of life to which they are entitled by birth and being.”

- Plutarch, 46-120 AD

Do Plutarch a favor and check out Mercy For Animals.

No but really, do the animals a favor and check them out. They’re a wonderful organization.

But, at least the cows picture is from EligeVeganismo. Do animals a favor, and check us out!

(Quelle: treekisser)

What happens to the 250 million male chicks born to hens in the U.S. egg industry each year?

Along with defective and slow-hatching female chicks, they are trashed as soon as they hatch. Upon breaking out of their shells, instead of being sheltered by a mother’s wings, the newborns are ground up alive, electrocuted, or thrown into trashcans where they slowly suffocate on top of one another, peeping to death while a human foot stomps them down to make more room for more chicks. Because the male chicken of the egg industry cannot lay eggs, and has not been genetically manipulated for profitable meat production, he is of no use to the egg industry. Destruction of unwanted male chicks is a worldwide practice.

libremente-violenta:

Funa Bayer, “Si es Bayer, NO es bueno”.

libremente-violenta:

Funa Bayer, “Si es Bayer, NO es bueno”.

(Quelle: pute-fran, via despiertaa)

houseofangryhippies:

thefitandhealthylife:

naespark:

The Bull Who Cried
Reported by “Weekly World News”, in Hong Kong, a group of workers took a bull to the slaughterhouse. They were about to enter the facillity when the bull suddenly stopped and knelt on its front paws.
The bull was crying.
Shiu, one of the workers, claims he started to shiver seeing those “scared and sad eyes”, and, as much as they tried to pull the bull inside, it wouldn’t move and just stood there, sobbing like a child.
The workers were not able to slay it, also tearing up at the sight, collecting funds to buy the animal and deliver it to the care of the monks of a nearby temple.
Apparently, when they said they would not kill it, the bull got up and followed them.
(Source Unkown, seen on Facebook)

Ooh my gosh </3

I remember this story. The workers all pitched in to buy his freedom.

houseofangryhippies:

thefitandhealthylife:

naespark:

The Bull Who Cried

Reported by “Weekly World News”, in Hong Kong, a group of workers took a bull to the slaughterhouse. They were about to enter the facillity when the bull suddenly stopped and knelt on its front paws.

The bull was crying.

Shiu, one of the workers, claims he started to shiver seeing those “scared and sad eyes”, and, as much as they tried to pull the bull inside, it wouldn’t move and just stood there, sobbing like a child.

The workers were not able to slay it, also tearing up at the sight, collecting funds to buy the animal and deliver it to the care of the monks of a nearby temple.

Apparently, when they said they would not kill it, the bull got up and followed them.

(Source Unkown, seen on Facebook)

Ooh my gosh </3

I remember this story. The workers all pitched in to buy his freedom.

(Quelle: naesnark, via xfrostx)

&#8220;In the consumption of eggs, there are victims&#8221;.
EligeVeganismo&#8217;s activist, the day of today. Santiago, Chile.

“In the consumption of eggs, there are victims”.

EligeVeganismo’s activist, the day of today. Santiago, Chile.

&#8220;Fear not, they do not feel&#8221;.
(c) Gretel Lusky

“Fear not, they do not feel”.

(c) Gretel Lusky

TW: Animal abuse.
EligeVeganismo&#8217;s Investigation, Chile.
Photographer: Gabriela Penela
&#8220;The mothers of mane species enjoy their children: from birth until they grow, teaching them, caressing them and every way they can show their affection. They try to end their mother work giving them all the tools needed for their independence, when their offspring endure the world on their own.
These are generations of slave mothers and children. Human use voids their most basic interests, reducing them to consumer goods, unable to obtain their happiness, and fulfil their needs.
Every animal in this world has hir own interests. The ability to suffer and enjoy make them our equals, and to understand this, all you need is a personal reflexion about our relationship with the rest of the sentient beings of the world, removing the prejudices that have grown with each and every one of them.&#8221;
Non human animals are not ours to use. They exist for their own reasons, and are in no way means to our ends, just as any other individual in this world.
www.EligeVeganismo.org

TW: Animal abuse.


EligeVeganismo’s Investigation, Chile.

Photographer: Gabriela Penela

“The mothers of mane species enjoy their children: from birth until they grow, teaching them, caressing them and every way they can show their affection. They try to end their mother work giving them all the tools needed for their independence, when their offspring endure the world on their own.

These are generations of slave mothers and children. Human use voids their most basic interests, reducing them to consumer goods, unable to obtain their happiness, and fulfil their needs.

Every animal in this world has hir own interests. The ability to suffer and enjoy make them our equals, and to understand this, all you need is a personal reflexion about our relationship with the rest of the sentient beings of the world, removing the prejudices that have grown with each and every one of them.”

Non human animals are not ours to use. They exist for their own reasons, and are in no way means to our ends, just as any other individual in this world.

www.EligeVeganismo.org